Image by Move2clouds
How to write a great research paper using reporting guidelines - A toolkit for writing research from the EQUATOR Network.
One of the first hurdles to get over when writing up a research plan or reporting the results of your study is finding the appropriate reporting guideline.
(Click image to navigate to EQUATOR main)
Image by Riphah International University
Citation Management Tools
Citation management is essential in a systematic review. There are a number of citation management tools available that are compatible with many of the databases and resources you'll use. Visit the citation management guide to get started. It only takes a few minutes to set up an account with such tools as Zotero, Mendeley and Endnote Online. For more advanced features, you may consider purchasing the desktop version of Endnote.
Below you will find selected resources to assist you with various functions on Endnote.
Downloading large results from EBSCO
In EBSCO databases, find a link called "Email a link to download exported results." This will allow you to download the results in RIS file format and import that RIS file into Zotero.
Image by Vancouver Tool Library
For more tools, check out:
Systematic Review Assistant (SRA) offers users a reliable program to remove duplicate records with greater sensitivity and specificity than EndNote. SRA aimed to reduce the amount of time taken to produce systematic reviews by maximizing the efficiency of the various review stages such as optimizing search strategies and screening, finding full text articles, and removing duplicate citations. This application can save researchers and information specialists time and avoid research waste. For more information, visit the OMICTOOLS ' web site and a review article.
CADIMA - Try this open access tool for all stages of your systematic review project!
Kohl, C., McIntosh, E. J., Unger, S., Haddaway, N. R., Kecke, S., Schiemann, J., & Wilhelm, R. (2018). Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: A case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environmental Evidence, 7, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5
Supporting several stages of the review process
Translation services AND MORE (grant application, protocol development, etc.)
Quality Assessment Tools
Which one to choose? Read the article below for further guidance.
Munthe-Kaas, H. M., Glenton, C., Booth, A., Noyes, J., & Lewin, S. (2019). Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: First stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0728-6. See Additional file 3 for a list of included critical appraisal tools.
Zeng, X., Zhang, Y., Kwong, J. S. W., Zhang, C., Li, S., Sun, F., Niu, Y., & Du, L. (2015). The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: A systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 8(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12141
Image by http://www.open.edu